Mining Threat Intelligence about Open-Source Projects and Libraries from Code Repository Issues and Bug Reports

Open-Source Projects and Libraries are being used in software development while also bearing multiple security vulnerabilities. This use of third party ecosystem creates a new kind of attack surface for a product in development. An intelligent attacker can attack a product by exploiting one of the vulnerabilities present in linked projects and libraries. In this paper, we mine threat intelligence about open source projects and libraries from bugs and issues reported on public code repositories. We also track library and project dependencies for installed software on a client machine. We represent and store this threat intelligence, along with the software dependencies in a security knowledge graph. Security analysts and developers can then query and receive alerts from the knowledge graph if any threat intelligence is found about linked libraries and projects, utilized in their products

Risks to Zero Trust in a Federated Mission Partner Environment

Recent cybersecurity events have prompted the federal government to begin investigating strategies to transition to Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) for federal information systems. Within federated mission networks, ZTA provides measures to minimize the potential for unauthorized release and disclosure of information outside bilateral and multilateral agreements. When federating with mission partners, there are potential risks that may undermine the benefits of Zero Trust. This paper explores risks associated with integrating multiple identity models and proposes two potential avenues to investigate in order to mitigate these risks

AI Security Threats against Pervasive Robotic Systems: A Course for Next Generation Cybersecurity Workforce

Robotics, automation, and related Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have become pervasive bringing in concerns related to security, safety, accuracy, and trust. With growing dependency on physical robots that work in close proximity to humans, the security of these systems is becoming increasingly important to prevent cyber-attacks that could lead to privacy invasion, critical operations sabotage, and bodily harm. The current shortfall of professionals who can defend such systems demands development and integration of such a curriculum. This course description includes details about seven self-contained and adaptive modules on "AI security threats against pervasive robotic systems". Topics include: 1) Introduction, examples of attacks, and motivation; 2) - Robotic AI attack surfaces and penetration testing; 3) - Attack patterns and security strategies for input sensors; 4) - Training attacks and associated security strategies; 5) - Inference attacks and associated security strategies; 6) - Actuator attacks and associated security strategies; and 7) - Ethics of AI, robotics, and cybersecurity

CAPoW: Context-Aware AI-Assisted Proof of Work based DDoS Defense

Critical servers can be secured against distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks using proof of work (PoW) systems assisted by an Artificial Intelligence (AI) that learns contextual network request patterns. In this work, we introduce CAPoW, a context-aware anti-DDoS framework that injects latency adaptively during communication by utilizing context-aware PoW puzzles. In CAPoW, a security professional can define relevant request context attributes which can be learned by the AI system. These contextual attributes can include information about the user request, such as IP address, time, flow-level information, etc., and are utilized to generate a contextual score for incoming requests that influence the hardness of a PoW puzzle. These puzzles need to be solved by a user before the server begins to process their request. Solving puzzles slow down the volume of incoming adversarial requests. Additionally, the framework compels the adversary to incur a cost per request, hence making it expensive for an adversary to prolong a DDoS attack. We include the theoretical foundations of the CAPoW framework along with a description of its implementation and evaluation.Comment: 8 page